These equations generate coordinates across the surface of a sphere. It’s hard to tell, but they compactly apply polar coordinate conversions twice. Let’s derive them one step at a time.

First, let’s say the south pole has a latitude of -90 degrees, and the north pole has a latitude of +90 degrees. Let’s traverse this span of latitudes in 10-degree ticks:

I’ll be playing with the scale a bit in each step to ensure that we can see the structure of our generated shapes. Eventually we will remove the scaling.

At each latitude, we want to trace out a circle that goes around the sphere. A circle goes from 0 degrees to 360 degrees. Let’s unroll the circles until they are flat and traverse their flattened perimeters in 30-degree ticks:

Now let’s roll the circles back up—turning our plane into a cylinder. We use sine and cosine to turn the longitude angle into the x- and z-coordinates of each latitude ring:

For a cylinder to become a sphere, we must taper the ends. The rings at the north and south poles should have very small radii, and the radius of the equator should be large. What function is small at -90, large at 0, and small at 90? Cosine is! We use it directly to compute each ring’s radius:

That’s not exactly spherical. One issue is the nonuniform scaling. We are shrinking along the y-axis but growing along the x- and z-axes. Let’s making the scaling uniform:

Oh, but that’s terrible. The other issue is that the y-coordinate of each ring is not correct. We are feeding in a number of degrees when a Cartesian coordinate is expected. The sine function converts our latitude to a y-coordinate on our latitude circle:

The surface now looks spherical. And we effectively have the parametric equations that we saw above. We converted the longitudes to Cartesian coordinates to generate a ring for each latitude, and we converted the latitude to size and position each ring.

Let’s fill the sphere in with the surface solidifier:

## Leave a Reply